Research Methods Glossary

Academic Writing Glossary → Browse the academic writing glossary Referencing & Citation Glossary → Browse the referencing and citation glossary

No terms match your search. Try a shorter word, or browse the A–Z above.

A

Abductive Reasoning

Abductive reasoning is a logical process that starts from a surprising or incomplete observation and works backward to the most plausible explanation, moving iteratively between data and theory rather than in one direction.

Positioned between deduction and induction, abductive reasoning is increasingly used in Australian business and design research where researchers cycle between fieldwork and emerging theory rather than following a strict linear path. Encountering an unexpected finding, such as staff resisting a policy that should have been popular, might prompt an abductive researcher to revise their framework rather than discard the data.

Action Research

Action research is a participatory design in which researchers and practitioners collaborate through repeated cycles of planning, acting, observing and reflecting to solve a practical problem within a real setting.

Popular among Australian teachers and nurses completing professional doctorates, action research lets a practitioner improve their own workplace while simultaneously generating research findings. A teacher might trial a new classroom feedback method, observe its effect on student engagement, adjust the approach, and repeat the cycle across a school term.

Alternative Hypothesis

The alternative hypothesis is the statement a researcher expects to support, proposing that a genuine relationship, effect or difference exists between variables, and is tested directly against the null hypothesis.

Written as H1 or Ha in Australian statistics coursework, the alternative hypothesis can be directional or non-directional depending on whether a specific direction of effect is predicted. A directional example is Group A will score higher than Group B, while a non-directional version simply predicts the two groups will differ.

Anonymity

Anonymity is a stronger privacy protection than confidentiality in which no one, including the researcher, can link a participant's identity to the data they provided at any stage of the study.

True anonymity is only possible in specific designs, such as an unsigned online survey with no IP logging or email collection, because a face-to-face interview cannot be truly anonymous to the interviewer. An Australian researcher distributing an anonymous online survey via social media cannot trace individual responses back to any respondent.

ANOVA

ANOVA, short for analysis of variance, is a statistical test that compares the means of three or more groups simultaneously to determine whether at least one differs significantly from the others.

Rather than running multiple t-tests, which inflates the risk of a false positive, an Australian researcher comparing exam marks across three university campuses would run a single one-way ANOVA. A significant result only shows that a difference exists somewhere among the groups, so post-hoc tests are needed to locate it.

Audit Trail

An audit trail is the complete, documented record of a researcher's data collection, coding decisions and analytical steps, kept so that another person could follow and verify the research process.

Keeping an audit trail is central to both dependability and confirmability in qualitative research, functioning like a lab notebook for interpretive work. An Australian PhD candidate using thematic analysis might keep dated coding logs and memos explaining why a code was renamed or merged, so an examiner can trace the analytic journey.

Axial Coding

Axial coding is the second stage of the grounded theory coding process, in which a researcher identifies relationships between the categories produced during open coding to rebuild the data in new ways.

Where open coding fragments the data, axial coding puts it back together by linking categories around a central concept, examining causes, contexts and consequences. An Australian social work researcher might use axial coding to connect the separate open codes 'isolation', 'distrust of services' and 'past negative experience' under one broader category.

C

Case Study

A case study is an in-depth, detailed investigation of a single individual, group, organisation or event, using multiple sources of evidence to understand it thoroughly within its real-world context.

Australian business and law students frequently use single or multiple case studies, such as one ASX-listed company's response to a data breach, drawing on interviews, company reports and media coverage together. Findings from a case study are rich and context-specific but are not intended to generalise statistically to every organisation.

Census

Census is a data collection exercise that attempts to gather information from every single member of a population, rather than from a sample, most familiar in Australia as the ABS national count.

Students sometimes confuse census with sample in early drafts, so methodology chapters benefit from stating explicitly which was used and why. A small honours project surveying every staff member in one 40-person university department is effectively conducting a census of that department, even though it is far smaller than the five-yearly ABS Census of Population and Housing.

Central Tendency

Central tendency refers to the statistical concept of identifying a single value, such as the mean, median or mode, that best represents the centre of a dataset.

Choosing the right measure of central tendency depends on the data and its shape: Australian researchers use the mean for symmetrical interval data, the median for skewed data such as income, and the mode for categorical variables like preferred study mode. Reporting the wrong one can misrepresent what is typical in a sample.

Chi-Square Test

A chi-square test is a statistical test that compares observed frequencies in categorical data against the frequencies expected by chance, to determine whether two categorical variables are significantly associated.

Applied to a cross-tabulation, a chi-square test could check whether Australian students' preferred referencing style (APA, Harvard, Vancouver) is associated with their faculty, producing a p-value that indicates whether the observed pattern is unlikely to be due to chance. It requires categorical, not continuous, data.

Closed Question

Closed question is a survey or interview item that offers respondents a fixed set of response options, such as yes/no or a rating scale, producing data that is easy to code and compare.

Closed questions dominate quantitative sections of AU survey instruments because they support statistical analysis across a large sample. A questionnaire might ask 'How often do you use campus counselling services?' with options never, rarely, sometimes, often, always, rather than leaving the answer open-ended.

Cluster Sampling

Cluster sampling is a probability method that randomly selects whole groups, or clusters, such as schools or suburbs, and then studies every member within the chosen clusters instead of individuals across the population.

Cluster sampling reduces travel and cost for AU researchers covering large or dispersed populations, since fieldwork is concentrated in a smaller number of locations. A study on rural health literacy might randomly select eight regional towns and survey every willing resident within them, rather than attempting to sample individuals scattered across an entire state.

Codebook

A codebook is a formal document that lists every code used in a qualitative analysis alongside its definition, inclusion criteria and an example, keeping coding consistent across a dataset or team.

A codebook entry typically records the code name, a short definition, when to apply it, and a sample quote, which is essential when more than one researcher is coding the same Australian interview dataset. Without a shared codebook, two coders might apply the same code inconsistently, weakening the final analysis.

Related: Coding, Theme, Category, NVivo

Coding

Coding is the process of systematically labelling segments of qualitative data, such as interview transcripts, with short descriptive tags that capture their meaning for later analysis.

Coding can be inductive, with codes emerging directly from the data, or deductive, applying codes drawn from existing theory or a prior codebook. An Australian researcher might code the sentence 'I never asked my supervisor because I felt stupid' under a code such as fear of judgement, later grouping related codes into broader themes.

Conceptual Framework

A conceptual framework is a visual or written representation of the key concepts, variables and their assumed relationships that a researcher develops to structure and guide their own specific study.

Unlike a theoretical framework, which is borrowed from an established theory, a conceptual framework is often built by the researcher for their specific study, sometimes combining ideas from several theories. An Australian honours student researching remote work productivity might draw a simple diagram linking flexibility, autonomy and output as their study's conceptual framework.

Confidence Interval

A confidence interval is a range of values, calculated from sample data, that is likely to contain the true population value with a stated level of confidence, usually 95 per cent.

A 95 per cent confidence interval means that if the same study were repeated many times, 95 per cent of the intervals calculated would contain the true population value. For example, an Australian opinion poll reporting 52 per cent support with a confidence interval of 48 to 56 per cent is signalling real uncertainty, not certainty, about the true level of support.

Confidentiality

Confidentiality is a researcher's commitment to control access to participants' data and identifiable information, storing and reporting it in ways that prevent unauthorised disclosure, even though identity may still be known to the research team.

Confidentiality differs from anonymity: a researcher interviewing small-business owners about a workplace dispute will know who said what but promises not to reveal it, replacing names with pseudonyms like Participant 4 in the thesis. Password-protected files and locked storage are standard confidentiality safeguards required by most Australian HRECs.

Confirmability

Confirmability is the degree to which a study's findings are shaped by participants' data and the phenomenon under investigation rather than by the researcher's own preferences, assumptions or bias.

Confirmability is the qualitative parallel to objectivity and is usually demonstrated through an audit trail plus reflexive notes explaining how the researcher's own position was managed. An Australian thesis appendix might include raw coding memos alongside the final themes so an examiner can trace each conclusion back to the data.

Confounding Variable

A confounding variable is an unaccounted-for factor that influences both the independent and dependent variables, creating a misleading association that can be mistaken for a genuine cause-and-effect relationship.

A classic Australian example is coffee consumption appearing linked to heart disease, when age is the confounding variable driving both. Researchers manage confounders through study design (random allocation, matching) or statistically, by measuring the confounder and adjusting for it during analysis rather than ignoring it.

Constant Comparison

Constant comparison is a grounded theory technique in which each new piece of data is systematically compared against previously coded data to refine categories and check whether existing codes still fit.

Rather than coding all data first and analysing it afterwards, constant comparison happens throughout data collection, so early interviews shape the questions asked in later ones. An Australian researcher interviewing new graduates about job readiness might revise a code after interview 12 shows it no longer captures what participants are describing.

Construct Validity

Construct validity is the degree to which a test, survey or measurement tool genuinely captures the abstract theoretical concept, such as motivation or anxiety, that it is designed to measure.

Construct validity is central in psychology, education and business research, where key variables (leadership, wellbeing, engagement) cannot be observed directly and must be operationalised through indicators. A researcher developing a new academic resilience scale would check construct validity by comparing scores against related, already-validated measures of stress and persistence.

Constructivism

Constructivism is a research paradigm proposing that individuals actively construct their own understanding of reality through social interaction and lived experience, meaning multiple valid interpretations of a phenomenon can coexist.

Closely related to interpretivism, constructivism is often the paradigm underlying Australian grounded theory studies, where theory is built up from participants' own constructed meanings rather than tested against an existing model. Two nurses describing the same ward incident very differently is, from a constructivist view, not a data error but expected.

Content Analysis

Content analysis is a systematic method for analysing the content of text, images or media by categorising and counting the frequency of specific words, concepts or themes.

Content analysis can be quantitative, counting how often a term like sustainability appears across a set of corporate annual reports, or qualitative, interpreting the meaning behind its use. Australian media and communications students often apply content analysis to compare how different newspapers frame the same policy issue over time.

Content Validity

Content validity is the extent to which the items in a test or survey fully and proportionately represent every dimension of the concept being measured, without notable gaps or overemphasis.

Content validity is usually judged by subject-matter experts rather than statistical tests. An Australian nursing academic designing a clinical-competency quiz would ask senior clinicians to review whether the questions cover the full scope of practice defined by the relevant professional standards, not just the topics that are easiest to test.

Control Variable

A control variable is a factor the researcher deliberately holds constant across all conditions of a study so that it cannot distort the observed relationship between the independent and dependent variables.

Where a confounding variable is an unwanted influence a researcher failed to anticipate, a control variable is one they have identified in advance and actively neutralise. An Australian lab-based psychology experiment might control room temperature and time of day so that only the manipulated variable can explain any difference in results.

Convenience Sampling

Convenience sampling is a non-probability method that selects participants simply because they are easiest to access, such as students in a researcher's own class, rather than through a systematic process.

Convenience sampling is common in AU undergraduate research projects with tight timeframes, but supervisors expect its limitations to be acknowledged explicitly in the discussion chapter. A student surveying study habits might recruit whoever is available in the university library on a given afternoon, which is quick to arrange but may not represent students who study elsewhere.

Correlation

Correlation is a statistical measure of the strength and direction of the relationship between two variables, expressed as a coefficient ranging from -1 to +1.

A correlation close to +1 or -1 indicates a strong relationship, while a value near 0 suggests little to no linear relationship, though correlation never establishes that one variable causes the other. An Australian study might report a correlation of r = .62 between hours of part-time work and lower assignment marks.

Correlational Research

Correlational research is a non-experimental design that measures the statistical relationship between two or more variables as they naturally occur, without manipulating any variable or establishing a cause-and-effect relationship.

A frequent student error is treating a correlational finding as proof of causation. An Australian study might find a positive correlation between hours of study and exam marks, but correlational research alone cannot confirm that studying causes higher marks rather than, say, motivated students both studying more and scoring higher.

Credibility

Credibility is the qualitative-research criterion concerned with whether a study's findings accurately represent participants' original views and experiences, functioning as the qualitative counterpart to internal validity.

Credibility is commonly strengthened through prolonged engagement with participants, triangulation of data sources, and member checking, where transcripts or themes are returned to participants to confirm accuracy. An Australian social-work researcher interviewing carers might email interview summaries back to each participant to check the interpretation feels right.

Criterion Validity

Criterion validity is the extent to which scores on a test or measure correlate with, and can predict, an outcome on a separate, well-established external measure or standard.

Criterion validity splits into concurrent validity (measured at the same time as the criterion) and predictive validity (measured later). An Australian university admissions researcher could test the predictive validity of ATAR scores by checking how strongly they correlate with students' actual first-year grade point averages.

Critical Appraisal

Critical appraisal is the systematic assessment of a study's methodological quality, validity and relevance, used to judge how much weight its findings should carry within a literature review or systematic review.

Standardised tools such as the CASP checklists or the JBI critical appraisal tools help Australian students assess sample size, bias and statistical reporting consistently across included studies. A systematic review might critically appraise 20 eligible studies and downgrade a poorly controlled trial's influence on the overall conclusion rather than treating all evidence as equal.

Cronbach's Alpha

Cronbach's Alpha is a statistic ranging from 0 to 1 that estimates the internal consistency of a multi-item scale, showing how closely related the individual items are as a group.

A Cronbach's Alpha above 0.7 is conventionally treated as acceptable internal consistency in most Australian social-science honours theses, though very high values above 0.95 can signal item redundancy. A ten-item wellbeing survey with an alpha of 0.85 suggests the items are reliably tapping into one underlying construct.

Cross-Sectional Study

A cross-sectional study is a research design that collects data from a sample at a single point in time, providing a snapshot of a population's characteristics or a relationship between variables.

Cross-sectional surveys are common in Australian undergraduate research because they fit within a single semester, unlike longitudinal designs that track change over years. A one-off online survey measuring university students' stress levels in a given week is cross-sectional; it cannot show whether stress is rising or falling over time.

Cross-Tabulation

Cross-tabulation is a technique for displaying the relationship between two categorical variables in a table of frequencies, showing how cases are distributed across the combined categories of both.

Also called a contingency table, a cross-tabulation might show how many male and female respondents in an Australian survey preferred online versus on-campus study, laid out in a grid of rows and columns. A chi-square test is then commonly applied to the same table to check whether the pattern is statistically significant.

D

Data Collection Method

Data collection method is the overall procedure a researcher uses to gather primary data, such as a survey, interview, focus group or observation, chosen to fit the research question and available resources.

Choosing a data collection method well means explaining, in the methodology chapter, why it fits the research question better than the alternatives, not just describing what was done. A study on classroom engagement might combine two data collection methods, structured observation for behavioural data and semi-structured interviews for teacher perspectives, so each method's limitations are offset by the other.

Data Management

Data management is the systematic planning for how research data will be collected, stored, secured, backed up, and eventually shared, archived or destroyed across the life of a project.

Most Australian universities require a formal Data Management Plan as part of ethics approval, specifying storage location, encryption and a retention period, commonly a minimum of five years after publication for standard research. A student storing interview recordings on a personal laptop without password protection or backup would typically fail a university's data management requirements.

Deductive Approach

A deductive approach is a reasoning strategy that begins with an existing theory, derives a specific testable hypothesis from it, and then collects data to confirm or refute that hypothesis.

Often summarised as moving from theory to data, the deductive approach is standard in Australian quantitative research and closely linked to positivism. A researcher might start from an established motivation theory, derive the hypothesis that flexible work arrangements increase job satisfaction, then test it using a large-scale employee survey.

Dependability

Dependability is the qualitative-research criterion showing that a study's process was logical, well-documented and consistent enough that another researcher could follow the same trail of decisions, mirroring reliability.

Dependability is typically evidenced through a detailed audit trail recording how data were collected, coded and interpreted at each stage. An Australian education researcher keeping a dated research diary documenting every change to their interview schedule and coding framework gives an examiner enough of a trail to judge the study's dependability.

Dependent Variable

A dependent variable is the outcome a researcher measures to see whether and how it changes in response to the independent variable, making it the study's primary focus of measurement.

Australian dissertation examiners look for a clearly labelled dependent variable in both the research question and the results chapter, since it is what the statistics ultimately test. In a study on the teaching-method example above, the dependent variable would likely be student test scores, measured identically across both groups.

Descriptive Research

Descriptive research is a design that systematically observes and documents the characteristics of a phenomenon, population or situation as it naturally exists, without manipulating variables or explaining why patterns occur.

The Australian Bureau of Statistics Census is a large-scale example of descriptive research, reporting who lives where and with what characteristics without testing any hypothesis about causes. Descriptive research typically answers what is currently happening, setting up later explanatory or correlational research to investigate why the pattern exists.

Descriptive Statistics

Descriptive statistics are numerical methods that summarise and organise the main features of a dataset, such as its central tendency and spread, without drawing conclusions beyond the data itself.

Australian research reports typically open their results section with descriptive statistics, such as means, percentages and frequency tables, before moving to inferential tests. For example, a thesis might report that survey respondents had a mean age of 34 years (SD = 8.2) before testing any hypotheses about age differences.

Discourse Analysis

Discourse analysis is a qualitative approach that examines how language is used within its social and cultural context to construct meaning, identity and power relations in text or speech.

Rather than just counting words like content analysis, discourse analysis asks how language choices shape social reality, such as examining how Australian government policy documents frame asylum seekers through particular word choices and metaphors. It draws heavily on linguistics and critical theory and is common in sociology and politics research.

E

Effect Size

Effect size is a standardised measure of the magnitude of a difference or relationship found in a study, reported independently of sample size to show practical importance.

Unlike a p-value, which is heavily influenced by sample size, effect size, such as Cohen's d for a t-test or r-squared for regression, tells an Australian reader how large a difference actually is. A large study can find a statistically significant but practically tiny effect size of d = 0.1.

Epistemology

Epistemology is the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature of knowledge, asking what counts as valid, justified belief and how a researcher can come to know what is true.

Australian research methods courses ask candidates to state their epistemological position early, since it shapes every later choice about design and method. A positivist epistemology assumes knowledge comes from objective measurement, whereas an interpretivist epistemology treats knowledge as socially constructed through meaning and interpretation.

Ethics Approval

Ethics approval is the formal permission granted by an institutional review body, confirming that a proposed study's design adequately protects participants' rights, welfare and privacy before any data collection begins.

Every Australian university requires ethics approval from its Human Research Ethics Committee for research involving people, with low-risk applications reviewed faster than projects involving children or medical procedures. A student surveying classmates for a course assignment usually still needs at least a low-risk or expedited ethics approval before distributing the survey.

Ethnography

Ethnography is a qualitative research design in which the researcher immerses themselves in a community or setting over an extended period to observe and document its culture, practices and social interactions.

Rooted in anthropology, ethnography is used in Australian nursing and organisational research to study culture from the inside, often through extended participant observation and field notes. A researcher might spend several months embedded in a rural hospital ward to understand how staff actually communicate during shift handovers, beyond what policy documents describe.

Exclusion Criteria

Exclusion criteria are the predefined reasons a study is removed from consideration in a literature review or systematic review, such as wrong population, unsuitable design, or insufficient reported data.

Exclusion criteria work alongside inclusion criteria and should be reported transparently in a PRISMA flow diagram, showing how many studies were removed at each stage and why. An Australian scoping review might exclude conference abstracts, non-English studies and grey literature without full peer review, listing each exclusion reason separately.

Experimental Design

Experimental design is a research approach in which the researcher deliberately manipulates one or more independent variables under controlled conditions, often using random allocation, to establish a cause-and-effect relationship.

True experimental designs, which randomly allocate participants to control and treatment groups, are the gold standard for establishing causation but are rare in Australian social science due to ethical and practical constraints. A university psychology lab testing a new memory technique might randomly assign students to a treatment or control condition to isolate its effect.

Explanatory Research

Explanatory research is a design that investigates why and how a relationship between variables occurs, going beyond describing patterns to test and clarify the underlying causes behind them.

Explanatory research usually follows descriptive or correlational work once a pattern has already been identified. After Australian data shows a correlation between rural postcode and lower university enrolment, explanatory research would dig into why, testing factors such as travel distance, cost or access to career advice as underlying causes.

Exploratory Research

Exploratory research is a flexible, often qualitative approach used to investigate a poorly understood problem, generate initial insights, and clarify concepts or hypotheses before a more structured study is designed.

When an Australian organisation faces a new problem with no existing local research, such as employee attitudes to a newly introduced four-day work week, an exploratory study using open-ended interviews might come first. Its findings can then inform a larger, more structured follow-up study rather than standing as a final answer.

External Validity

External validity is the extent to which findings from a study can be applied beyond the specific sample, setting or time period in which the research was conducted.

External validity is closely tied to generalisability and is often a trade-off against internal validity, since tightly controlled lab conditions can limit real-world relevance. A study of Melbourne university students' study habits, for instance, may have low external validity for TAFE students or working professionals in regional Australia.

F

Face Validity

Face validity is the informal, surface-level judgement that a test or measure appears, on the face of it, to measure what it is intended to measure.

Face validity is the weakest form of validity evidence because it relies on subjective impression rather than systematic testing, so it is usually treated as a first check, not final proof. Piloting a new questionnaire with a handful of classmates who confirm the questions look right for the topic is a common student-level face-validity check.

Field Notes

Field notes are the written records a researcher makes during or immediately after observation or fieldwork, capturing what was seen, heard and initially interpreted for later analysis.

Keeping field notes descriptive and separate from personal reflection is standard advice given to Australian qualitative researchers, often using two columns or clearly labelled sections. After a participant observation session at a community health clinic, a researcher might jot 'waiting room quiet, staff greeted each patient by name' as description, then add a separate reflective note on possible significance.

Focus Group

Focus group is a data collection method in which a small group of participants discusses a topic together under a facilitator's guidance, generating data from their interaction as well as their individual views.

Focus groups suit AU marketing and social-policy research where group dynamics and shared norms are of interest, not just individual opinions. A researcher exploring attitudes to a proposed council recycling scheme might run three focus groups of six to eight residents each, noting where participants agree, disagree or build on one another's comments.

Framework Analysis

Framework analysis is a systematic qualitative method that organises data into a structured matrix of cases and themes, allowing patterns to be compared across participants as well as within them.

Developed originally for applied policy research, framework analysis moves through familiarisation, identifying a thematic framework, indexing, charting and mapping, producing a matrix with participants as rows and themes as columns. Australian health services researchers favour it for its transparent, auditable structure when working within multidisciplinary teams and tight project timelines.

G

Gatekeeper

Gatekeeper is a person or organisation that controls researcher access to a site, population or set of documents, and whose permission is often needed before recruitment or observation can begin.

Negotiating access through a gatekeeper is a practical step Australian researchers plan for well before ethics approval, since fieldwork cannot start without it. A student wanting to observe classes at a Sydney primary school would need sign-off from a gatekeeper such as the school principal, in addition to separate parental consent for each child.

Generalisability

Generalisability is the extent to which conclusions drawn from a study's sample can reasonably be extended to the wider population, setting or context from which that sample was drawn.

Generalisability is closely linked to external validity and depends heavily on sample size and sampling method. A survey of 40 students at one Sydney private college has limited generalisability to the broader Australian undergraduate population, whereas a large stratified national sample supports much stronger generalisability claims.

Grey Literature

Grey literature is research output such as government reports, theses, conference papers, policy briefs and industry reports that falls outside traditional peer-reviewed academic journals and books.

Including grey literature in a systematic review can reduce publication bias, since government and NGO reports often include null or unfavourable results that journals are less likely to publish. An Australian public-policy student researching homelessness interventions might search the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare and state-government websites alongside academic databases.

Grounded Theory

Grounded theory is a qualitative research design in which theory is systematically developed from data collected in the field, rather than tested from an existing theoretical framework decided in advance.

Developed by Glaser and Strauss, grounded theory uses constant comparison, coding and theoretical sampling until new data stops adding anything new, a point Australian candidates often call saturation. A social work researcher exploring a newly emerging issue, such as support gaps for young carers, might use grounded theory precisely because no adequate theory yet exists.

H

Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC)

A Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) is an institutional panel that reviews and approves proposed research involving human participants to ensure it meets national ethical standards before it proceeds.

Every registered Australian university has at least one HREC, constituted under the NHMRC's National Statement with members including researchers, lay community representatives and, often, a lawyer or pastoral-care representative. A doctoral candidate proposing to interview cancer patients would submit a detailed protocol to their university's HREC and could not begin recruitment until it was approved.

Hypothesis

A hypothesis is a testable, specific prediction about the expected relationship between two or more variables, stated before data collection so that evidence can support or refute it.

In quantitative Australian research, a hypothesis is usually paired with a null hypothesis and tested statistically against a conventional significance threshold such as .05. For example, a hypothesis might state that increased screen time is associated with lower sleep quality in Australian adolescents, which a survey study would then test.

I

Inclusion Criteria

Inclusion criteria are the predefined characteristics a study must have, such as population, publication date range or study design, to be eligible for selection in a literature review or systematic review.

Setting inclusion criteria before searching reduces selection bias, since a researcher cannot cherry-pick studies that support a preferred conclusion after the fact. An Australian systematic review on adolescent screen time might set inclusion criteria of peer-reviewed studies, published in English between 2015 and 2025, involving participants aged 12 to 18.

Independent Variable

An independent variable is the factor a researcher deliberately changes, manipulates or categorises in order to observe what effect it has on another, dependent variable within the study.

In an Australian classroom-based experiment testing teaching methods, the independent variable might be the teaching approach used (traditional lecture versus flipped classroom), which the researcher sets deliberately across two groups. In non-experimental designs the independent variable is often a naturally occurring category, such as gender or postcode, rather than something manipulated.

Inductive Approach

An inductive approach is a reasoning strategy that begins with detailed observations or data, then works upward to identify patterns and build new theory, rather than testing a theory already chosen.

Common in Australian qualitative studies using grounded theory or ethnography, the inductive approach suits topics where existing theory is thin or a poor fit for the local context. A researcher interviewing First Nations business owners with no relevant existing model would build explanatory themes inductively from the interview transcripts themselves.

Inferential Statistics

Inferential statistics are techniques that use sample data to make estimates, predictions or generalisations about a wider population, typically by testing hypotheses at a set significance level.

Where descriptive statistics stop at the sample, inferential statistics let an Australian honours or PhD candidate argue that a pattern found in, say, 200 survey respondents likely holds for the broader population the sample was drawn from. A t-test comparing two group means is a common inferential procedure in undergraduate research projects.

Inter-Rater Reliability

Inter-rater reliability is the degree of agreement between two or more independent observers or coders who assess, rate or classify the same data using the same criteria.

Inter-rater reliability matters most in qualitative coding and observational studies, and is often reported as a percentage agreement or Cohen's kappa statistic. Two Australian coders independently thematically analysing the same set of interview transcripts would calculate inter-rater reliability to demonstrate their coding scheme was applied consistently, not idiosyncratically.

Internal Validity

Internal validity is the degree to which a study's design rules out alternative explanations, allowing a researcher to confidently attribute an observed effect to the variable being tested.

Threats to internal validity include confounding variables, selection effects and poor control conditions. An Australian honours student testing a new teaching method would strengthen internal validity by randomly allocating classes to control and treatment groups rather than letting teachers self-select, so any difference in results can be attributed to the method itself.

Interpretivism

Interpretivism is a research paradigm asserting that social reality is subjective and constructed through human experience, so understanding meaning from participants' own perspectives matters more than measuring objective facts.

Common in Australian education and social work research, interpretivism favours small, in-depth qualitative studies over large representative samples, since the goal is rich understanding rather than statistical generalisation. A researcher studying how refugee students experience an Australian classroom would use interpretivist interviews to capture individual meaning-making.

Interquartile Range

The interquartile range is a measure of spread equal to the difference between the 75th and 25th percentiles of a dataset, capturing the range of the middle 50 per cent of scores.

Because it ignores the top and bottom quarters of a distribution, the interquartile range is far less affected by extreme scores than the full range, which is why Australian statisticians often use it to define outliers on a box plot. A dataset with quartiles of 60 and 85 has an interquartile range of 25.

Interview Schedule

Interview schedule is the prepared list of questions and prompts an interviewer uses to guide a structured or semi-structured interview, ensuring key topics are covered consistently across participants.

AU ethics applications typically require a draft interview schedule to be submitted alongside the research proposal so reviewers can check questions are appropriate and unlikely to cause distress. A schedule for a study on international student experience might list seven core questions plus optional follow-up prompts for the interviewer to use as needed, rather than a rigid script.

K

Key Informant

Key informant is a well-placed individual with specialist knowledge of a group, organisation or setting, recruited to provide insider information or to help a researcher identify further participants.

Key informants are often interviewed early in Australian fieldwork to orient the researcher before broader data collection begins, particularly in community or organisational studies. A researcher studying a regional arts festival might first interview the festival's long-serving volunteer coordinator as a key informant, then use her introductions to recruit other volunteers through snowball sampling.

Kurtosis

Kurtosis is a statistic that describes the shape of a distribution's tails and peak relative to a normal distribution, indicating whether extreme values are more or less common than expected.

A distribution with high kurtosis has a sharper peak and heavier tails than a normal distribution, meaning more scores cluster near the mean but outliers are also more frequent. Australian statistics units usually introduce kurtosis alongside skewness as part of checking whether data meet the assumptions of a parametric test.

L

Likert Scale

Likert scale is a rating scale, typically ranging from five to seven points, that asks respondents to indicate their level of agreement or disagreement with a series of statements.

Likert scales are a standard feature of Australian survey-based theses because responses can be treated as ordinal or, cautiously, as interval data for statistical testing. A typical item might read 'I feel confident using online learning platforms' with options from strongly disagree to strongly agree, scored 1 to 5.

Linear Regression

Linear regression is a statistical method that models the relationship between one predictor variable and one outcome variable as a straight line, used to predict or explain the outcome.

The output of a linear regression is an equation in the form y = a + bx, which an Australian honours student might use to predict final exam marks from hours spent studying. The slope, b, tells you how many marks the model predicts will change for each extra hour of study.

Literature Review

A literature review is a critical, structured survey of existing scholarship on a topic that identifies patterns, debates and gaps in order to position a new study within its field.

A literature review is not a list of summaries; it synthesises sources thematically and argues where the current evidence is strong, contested or missing. An Australian honours student researching mental health apps would group sources by theme, such as efficacy, engagement and privacy, rather than describing one study, then the next, then the next.

Longitudinal Study

A longitudinal study is a research design that collects data from the same participants or population repeatedly over an extended period, allowing researchers to observe change, development or trends over time.

The Australian Institute of Family Studies runs several well-known national longitudinal studies tracking the same children and families over many years. Because they require ongoing funding and participant retention, longitudinal designs are rare in student research but common in government and university-led research on ageing, health and child development.

M

Mean

The mean is the arithmetic average of a set of numerical values, calculated by summing all observations and dividing by the number of observations.

The mean is the most commonly reported measure of central tendency in Australian quantitative research but is sensitive to outliers, which can pull it away from where most scores actually sit. A dataset of exam marks with one extreme fail can drag the mean below what most students actually scored.

Measurement Scale

Measurement scale is the level at which a variable is recorded, classified as nominal, ordinal, interval or ratio, which determines what statistical techniques can later be applied to it.

Choosing the correct measurement scale during data collection matters because it constrains later analysis in an AU quantitative thesis, for instance ordinal Likert data is usually treated differently to true interval data. A survey item recording 'highest qualification: certificate, diploma, bachelor, postgraduate' is measured on an ordinal scale, not a ratio scale like income measured in dollars.

Median

The median is the middle value in a dataset when all observations are ordered from smallest to largest, splitting the distribution into two equal halves.

Australian researchers report the median instead of the mean when data are skewed, such as household income or years of work experience, because extreme values distort the mean but barely shift the median. Household income figures from the ABS, for instance, are typically reported as medians for this reason.

Related: Mean, Mode, Skewness, Range

Member Checking

Member checking is a credibility technique in which a researcher shares interview transcripts, themes or draft interpretations with participants so they can confirm, correct or challenge the accuracy of what was captured.

Member checking can happen at the transcript stage (confirming what was said) or the interpretation stage (confirming what it means), and disagreement is itself useful data. An Australian qualitative researcher studying student mental health might send draft themes to participants and revise a theme that participants felt mischaracterised their experience of stress.

Meta-Analysis

A meta-analysis is a statistical technique that combines numerical results from multiple independent studies addressing the same question into a single, more precise pooled estimate of an effect.

A meta-analysis is usually the quantitative component nested inside a systematic review and is often presented visually as a forest plot showing each study's effect size and confidence interval. An Australian public-health meta-analysis of 15 trials on a smoking-cessation programme might report a pooled quit rate more precise than any single trial could show alone.

Mixed Methods Research

Mixed methods research is a design that deliberately combines quantitative and qualitative data within a single study, integrating both to produce a fuller understanding than either approach alone could provide.

Popular in Australian public health and policy research, mixed methods designs are typically sequential (a survey followed by interviews to explain the numbers) or concurrent (both collected at the same time). A pragmatist paradigm usually underpins the choice, since the research question, not philosophical purity, decides the mix.

Mode

The mode is the value that occurs most frequently in a dataset, and a distribution can have one mode, more than one mode, or no mode at all.

The mode is most useful for categorical data where means and medians make no sense, such as identifying the most common degree major among survey respondents. A dataset with two equally frequent values, for example Bachelor of Arts and Bachelor of Commerce as the top responses, is described as bimodal.

Multiple Regression

Multiple regression is a statistical method that models the relationship between one outcome variable and two or more predictor variables at the same time, estimating each predictor's independent contribution.

Because real outcomes rarely have a single cause, Australian postgraduate researchers often use multiple regression to control for confounding variables, such as testing whether study hours predict marks after accounting for prior GPA and part-time work hours. SPSS reports each predictor's individual effect alongside the model's overall explanatory power.

Multistage Sampling

Multistage sampling is a probability technique that combines two or more sampling stages, such as first selecting clusters and then randomly sampling individuals within them, to make large-scale sampling more manageable.

Multistage sampling is common in large AU national studies where sampling every individual directly would be impractical across such a wide area. A national survey might first randomly select 20 postcodes, then randomly select 15 households within each chosen postcode, combining cluster and simple random sampling across two distinct stages.

N

Narrative Analysis

Narrative analysis is a qualitative method that examines the stories people tell, focusing on structure, sequence and context, to understand how individuals make sense of their experiences.

Rather than breaking transcripts into fragmented codes, narrative analysis keeps a participant's story largely intact, examining how they sequence events and position themselves as the central character. An Australian aged-care researcher might use narrative analysis to explore how a single resident constructs meaning from a lifetime of career changes.

Narrative Inquiry

Narrative inquiry is a qualitative research design that collects and analyses the stories people tell about their lives or experiences to understand meaning, identity and how events are made sense of over time.

Used in Australian education and health research, narrative inquiry treats a participant's personal story, told in their own words and sequence, as the primary data rather than something to be broken into codes. A researcher might collect a teacher's account of their first year in a remote school as a single, rich narrative case.

Narrative Review

A narrative review is a broad, qualitative overview of existing literature on a topic, synthesised through the author's own expert interpretation rather than a fixed, replicable search and selection process.

Narrative reviews are common as the literature review chapter of an Australian undergraduate or honours thesis because they are flexible and quicker to produce than a systematic review. Unlike a systematic review, a narrative review does not have to report a specific search strategy, database list or PRISMA flow diagram.

Non-Parametric Test

A non-parametric test is a statistical test that does not assume the data follow a normal distribution, making it suitable for skewed, ordinal or small-sample data.

Non-parametric tests such as the Mann-Whitney U or Spearman correlation are common fallbacks in Australian undergraduate projects when a small or skewed sample cannot meet the assumptions of a t-test or Pearson correlation. Chi-square tests are also non-parametric, since they analyse categorical rather than continuous data.

Non-Participant Observation

Non-participant observation is a data collection method in which the researcher watches and records a setting or behaviour from the outside, without taking part in the activity being studied.

Non-participant observation is often preferred in AU classroom research because it limits the observer's influence on the behaviour being studied, compared with participant observation. A researcher evaluating group-work skills might sit at the back of a lecture theatre and use a structured tally sheet to record how often students speak during tutorials, without joining the discussion themselves.

Non-Probability Sampling

Non-probability sampling is any sampling approach in which not every population member has a known or equal chance of selection, chosen for practicality or depth rather than statistical generalisability.

Non-probability sampling dominates qualitative honours and PhD research in Australia because it prioritises rich, information-dense cases over statistical representativeness. A study exploring lived experience of drought among farmers in western New South Wales would typically use non-probability sampling to reach a small number of information-rich participants rather than aiming for a randomly representative sample.

Non-Response Bias

Non-response bias is a distortion that arises when people who decline to take part in a study differ systematically from those who do respond, skewing results even with a large sample.

Non-response bias is a key reason AU researchers discuss response rate explicitly rather than assuming a low rate is only a minor limitation. A workplace wellbeing survey might suffer non-response bias if employees experiencing the most burnout are also the least likely to find time to complete it, leaving the results looking more positive than reality.

Normal Distribution

A normal distribution is a symmetrical, bell-shaped spread of data in which most scores cluster around the mean and progressively fewer occur further away in either direction.

Many parametric tests used in Australian honours theses, including the t-test and ANOVA, assume the outcome variable is approximately normally distributed, which researchers typically check with a histogram or a Shapiro-Wilk test before analysis. Height and IQ scores are classic examples that approximate a normal distribution in large populations.

Null Hypothesis

The null hypothesis is the default statistical statement that no relationship or difference exists between the variables being studied, which researchers attempt to reject using sample data and statistical tests.

Australian honours and postgraduate statistics units teach students to write the null hypothesis (H0) alongside the alternative hypothesis (H1) before running any test. For a study comparing two teaching methods, H0 would state that there is no difference in student grades between the methods, which the data may or may not support rejecting.

NVivo

NVivo is a qualitative data analysis software program that helps researchers organise, code and retrieve themes from interview transcripts, documents and other non-numerical data.

Widely used in Australian PhD and honours qualitative projects, NVivo lets a researcher tag passages of text with codes, then run queries to see every excerpt coded under a theme such as workplace stress across all interview transcripts at once. It does not do the interpretive work itself, only organises it.

O

Observation

Observation is a data collection method in which a researcher systematically watches and records behaviour, events or interactions as they naturally occur, rather than asking participants to report on them.

Observation is valuable in Australian classroom and workplace research because it captures what people actually do, which can differ from what they self-report in a survey. A researcher studying playground behaviour might use a structured checklist to record how often children engage in cooperative versus solitary play during each ten-minute block, without interviewing the children themselves.

Ontology

Ontology is the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature of reality and existence, asking whether there is a single objective truth or multiple constructed realities shaped by perspective.

Ontology sits alongside epistemology in an Australian thesis's philosophical positioning section and is easy to confuse with it: ontology asks what is real, while epistemology asks how we can know it. A realist ontology assumes a single measurable reality external to the researcher; a relativist ontology assumes multiple, equally valid social realities.

Related: Epistemology, Paradigm, Positivism

Open Coding

Open coding is the first stage of the grounded theory coding process, in which a researcher reads data line by line and assigns provisional labels to every distinct concept found.

Open coding deliberately produces far more codes than will survive into the final analysis, since the aim at this stage is to stay close to the data rather than force it into categories too early. A single Australian interview transcript might generate 40 or more open codes before any grouping begins.

Open-Ended Question

Open-ended question is a survey or interview item with no fixed response options, allowing participants to answer in their own words and giving richer, more detailed data than closed formats.

Open-ended questions are common in AU mixed-methods surveys and qualitative interviews because they capture nuance a Likert scale cannot. Instead of asking respondents to rate satisfaction from 1 to 5, an open-ended version might ask 'What, if anything, would improve your experience of online tutorials?', generating text that is later coded thematically.

Operationalisation

Operationalisation is the process of converting an abstract concept or theoretical construct into specific, measurable indicators or procedures that allow it to be observed, recorded and analysed empirically.

An Australian workplace study on job satisfaction cannot measure the abstract concept directly, so it must operationalise satisfaction as, for example, scores on a validated ten-item Likert-scale survey. Poor operationalisation is one of the most common weaknesses examiners flag in undergraduate methodology chapters.

Outlier

An outlier is a data point that differs markedly from the other values in a dataset, sitting unusually far above or below the general pattern of the results.

Outliers can arise from genuine extreme cases, data-entry errors, or measurement faults, and Australian researchers typically flag them using a box plot before deciding whether to investigate, transform or exclude them. A participant who reports working 150 hours a week in a survey is a likely candidate for outlier checking.

P

P-Value

A p-value is the probability of observing a result as extreme as, or more extreme than, the one found in a study if there were truly no effect in the population.

Australian journals typically treat a p-value below .05 as the conventional threshold for statistical significance, though this cutoff is a convention rather than a proof of importance. A p-value of .03 means there is only a 3 per cent chance of seeing this result, or a more extreme one, if no real effect existed.

Paradigm

A paradigm is the overarching set of beliefs, values and assumptions about knowledge and reality that guides how a researcher views the world and approaches a research problem methodologically.

Australian methodology chapters usually name a specific paradigm, most often positivism, interpretivism, constructivism or pragmatism, and explain how it flows through to the chosen design. Choosing a paradigm is not a formality; it justifies why, for example, a qualitative case study rather than a randomised experiment suits the research problem.

Participant Observation

Participant observation is a qualitative data collection method in which the researcher joins and takes part in the setting or community being studied while simultaneously recording observations about it.

Participant observation gives AU ethnographic researchers insider access to a group's everyday practices, though it raises questions about maintaining objectivity that supervisors expect to see discussed. A researcher studying a community sporting club might attend training sessions as a volunteer for six months, writing field notes after each session, rather than only interviewing members afterwards.

Pearson Correlation

Pearson correlation is a statistic that measures the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two continuous variables, assuming both are normally distributed and measured on interval or ratio scales.

Denoted r, Pearson correlation is the default coefficient reported in SPSS output for continuous data such as exam marks and hours of study. Because it only captures linear relationships, Australian statistics courses teach students to inspect a scatter plot first, since Pearson's r can miss a strong curved relationship entirely.

Peer Review

Peer review is the process by which independent experts in a field critically evaluate a manuscript's methodology, evidence and conclusions before it is accepted for publication in an academic journal.

Peer review is a key quality marker Australian universities teach students to check for, since peer-reviewed journal articles are generally considered more credible sources than blogs or unreviewed preprints. Most database interfaces let a student restrict results to peer-reviewed only with one filter, quickly excluding non-scholarly material from a literature review.

Phenomenology

Phenomenology is a qualitative research design that explores the lived experience of a phenomenon from the perspective of those who have directly experienced it, aiming to describe its essential meaning.

Common in Australian nursing and allied health research, a phenomenological study might interview a small number of cancer survivors in depth to understand what the experience of remission genuinely feels like, rather than measuring outcomes numerically. The aim is a rich description of shared meaning, not a generalisable statistic.

Pilot Study

Pilot study is a small-scale trial run of a research instrument or procedure, conducted before the main study to identify and fix problems with wording, timing or logistics.

AU supervisors routinely expect a pilot study before full-scale data collection, since it can reveal that a question is confusing or a survey takes far longer than planned. Before distributing a 40-item questionnaire, a researcher might pilot it with five participants similar to the target population, timing completion and asking for feedback on unclear wording.

Population

Population is the complete set of people, cases, organisations or events that share the characteristics a study is designed to investigate, from which a sample is later drawn.

Australian researchers typically define the population narrowly enough to be feasible, then justify why it matches the research question in the methodology chapter. For example, a thesis on remote schooling might define its population as all secondary teachers in regional Queensland state schools rather than all Australian teachers, keeping data collection realistic within a candidature's timeframe.

Positionality

Positionality is a researcher's explicit acknowledgement of how their social identity, such as gender, culture, professional role or lived experience, shapes their perspective on the research topic.

Positionality is usually stated early in a qualitative thesis or in the methodology chapter, distinguishing an insider researcher who shares participants' experience from an outsider who does not. An Australian Aboriginal health researcher studying their own community would typically state their positionality and how it shaped access and trust.

Positivism

Positivism is a research paradigm holding that reality is objective and measurable, and that valid knowledge is produced through observation, experimentation and statistical analysis conducted independently of the researcher.

Rooted in the natural sciences, positivism underpins most Australian quantitative research in fields like epidemiology and economics, where researchers aim for objectivity, replicability and generalisable results. A positivist study on vaccination uptake, for example, would rely on large-scale numerical survey data rather than in-depth personal interviews.

Pragmatism

Pragmatism is a research paradigm that rejects strict allegiance to one philosophical position, instead choosing whatever combination of quantitative and qualitative methods best answers the specific research question at hand.

Pragmatism is the philosophical home of most mixed methods research in Australian applied fields such as public health and business, where solving a real-world problem matters more than theoretical purity. A pragmatist evaluating a workplace safety programme might combine incident statistics with staff interviews simply because together they answer the question better.

Primary Data

Primary data is original information collected first-hand by the researcher for the specific purposes of the current study, using methods such as surveys, interviews or observation.

Collecting primary data gives an Australian researcher full control over question wording, sample and timing, but it takes more time and usually requires ethics approval before fieldwork begins. A thesis on hybrid work preferences might rely on primary data gathered through an original online questionnaire distributed to 150 employees, rather than reusing an existing dataset.

PRISMA

PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is an evidence-based reporting checklist and flow diagram that guides researchers in transparently documenting how studies were identified, screened and included.

The PRISMA flow diagram visually tracks records from initial database search through duplicate removal, title/abstract screening, full-text assessment and final inclusion, reporting an exact number at each stage. An Australian systematic review might start with 2,400 records found across four databases and end with only 18 studies meeting all inclusion criteria.

Probability Sampling

Probability sampling is any sampling approach in which every member of the population has a known, non-zero chance of being selected, allowing results to be generalised with calculable confidence.

Probability sampling underpins most quantitative honours and PhD projects in Australia because it supports inferential statistics and generalisation to the wider population. A researcher surveying attitudes to renewable energy might use simple random sampling from the electoral roll so every voter has an equal chance of selection, strengthening claims made in the findings chapter.

Publication Bias

Publication bias is the tendency for studies with statistically significant or positive results to be published more often than studies with null or negative findings, skewing the available evidence.

Publication bias can make an intervention look more effective in a meta-analysis than it really is, because unpublished null-result studies are missing from the pooled data. Australian systematic reviewers often check for publication bias using a funnel plot or by searching trial registries and grey literature for unpublished results.

Purposive Sampling

Purposive sampling is a non-probability method in which the researcher deliberately selects participants or cases judged most likely to provide rich, relevant information about the research question.

Purposive sampling is the default choice for most qualitative theses in Australia because it targets participants with direct, relevant experience rather than a statistically representative cross-section. A researcher studying return-to-work after injury might deliberately recruit ten participants who have each returned to work within the past twelve months, chosen specifically for their recent, relevant experience.

Q

Qualitative Research

Qualitative research is an approach to inquiry that explores meaning, experience and social phenomena through non-numerical data such as words, images or observations, typically analysed for themes and patterns.

Australian social work, nursing and education researchers often choose qualitative methods such as interviews, focus groups or ethnography when a topic is under-explored or highly context-dependent. A study into community perceptions of a new health programme, for instance, would usually favour qualitative interviews over a numerical survey to capture nuance.

Quantitative Research

Quantitative research is a systematic approach to inquiry that collects numerical data and uses statistical methods to test hypotheses, measure relationships, and generalise findings from a sample to a wider population.

Common in Australian business, health and education faculties, quantitative research typically uses surveys, experiments or existing datasets such as ABS statistics, analysed with software like SPSS or R. It is usually paired with a positivist paradigm and a deductive approach, moving from theory to hypothesis to numerical testing.

Quasi-Experimental Design

Quasi-experimental design is a research approach that tests cause-and-effect relationships between variables without random allocation to groups, typically because the groups already exist naturally or randomisation is not ethically possible.

Quasi-experimental designs are common in Australian education policy research, where randomly assigning students to different schools or curricula is impossible. Comparing NAPLAN outcomes between two existing schools that adopted a new literacy programme against two that did not is quasi-experimental, since students were not randomly placed into either group.

Questionnaire

Questionnaire is the written instrument, containing a fixed set of questions, that a survey uses to collect data directly from respondents in a standardised, repeatable format.

Australian researchers usually pilot a questionnaire with a small group before full distribution, checking that wording is clear and not culturally biased. A questionnaire on international student wellbeing might combine a five-point Likert scale for stress levels with one open-ended question asking what support would help most, mixing structured and free-text data.

Quota Sampling

Quota sampling is a non-probability method that sets fixed numbers of participants for particular subgroups, such as age or gender categories, and then fills each quota using convenient or purposive recruitment.

Quota sampling resembles stratified sampling in structure but skips random selection within each subgroup, so it is faster though less statistically rigorous. A market-style AU student survey might set quotas of 25 first-years, 25 second-years and 25 third-years and recruit whoever is available in each year group until every quota is filled.

R

Randomised Controlled Trial

A randomised controlled trial is an experimental design that randomly assigns participants to either a treatment group or a control group, allowing researchers to attribute any resulting difference confidently to the treatment itself.

Widely used in Australian clinical and health research overseen by bodies such as the NHMRC, a randomised controlled trial is considered one of the strongest designs for establishing causation. A trial testing a new physiotherapy technique might randomly allocate patients to receive either the new technique or standard care, then compare recovery times.

Range

The range is a measure of spread calculated by subtracting the smallest value in a dataset from the largest, giving a single figure for how widely the data are dispersed.

The range is quick to calculate but is heavily distorted by a single extreme score, which is why Australian methods textbooks often pair it with the interquartile range for a more robust picture. Test scores from 40 to 98 give a range of 58, even if most students scored between 70 and 85.

Reflexivity

Reflexivity is the ongoing practice of a researcher critically examining and disclosing how their own background, beliefs and position may be shaping the research process and its conclusions.

Reflexivity is expected practice in Australian qualitative research, especially where a researcher shares characteristics with participants, such as a nurse-researcher studying nurses' burnout. Many theses include a reflexivity statement or research diary excerpt acknowledging how the researcher's own clinical experience might colour their reading of interview data.

Regression

Regression is a statistical technique used to model and predict the value of one variable based on its relationship with one or more other variables.

Regression goes a step beyond correlation by producing an equation that estimates outcomes, which Australian business and social science students use to forecast things like predicted sales from advertising spend. The output typically includes a coefficient showing how much the outcome changes for each one-unit increase in the predictor.

Reliability

Reliability is the extent to which a research instrument or procedure produces consistent, stable results when it is repeated under the same conditions or applied by different observers.

Reliability is necessary but not sufficient for validity: a bathroom scale that is always 3kg too heavy is highly reliable yet invalid. Common reliability checks in Australian honours and postgraduate projects include test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability and internal-consistency measures such as Cronbach's alpha for multi-item scales.

Replication

Replication is the repetition of a study's methods, either exactly or with deliberate variations, to determine whether the original findings hold up under the same or different conditions.

Replication is a cornerstone of rigour and has become a major concern across social science following the replication crisis, where many published findings failed to reproduce. An Australian methods course might set an assignment asking students to attempt a conceptual replication of a classic study using a local, contemporary Australian sample.

Research Aim

A research aim is the broad statement of overall purpose that a study intends to achieve, expressed as a single overarching goal from which more specific objectives are then derived.

In an Australian thesis introduction, the aim is usually one sentence beginning with a verb such as to evaluate, sitting above the numbered objectives that break it into achievable steps. The aim to evaluate workplace mental health interventions in Queensland might then unpack into three or four measurable objectives.

Research Design

Research design is the overall plan or blueprint that specifies how a study will be conducted, including the strategy, data collection methods, and analysis techniques used to answer the research question.

Australian candidates typically select a design early and justify it in the methodology chapter against alternatives considered. For example, a nursing honours student investigating patient handover errors might choose a cross-sectional survey design over a longitudinal cohort design because of a 12-month thesis timeline, then defend that trade-off explicitly to their supervisor.

Research Ethics

Research ethics is the set of moral principles and formal standards governing how researchers treat participants, data and knowledge, covering consent, confidentiality, harm minimisation and honest conduct throughout a study.

In Australia, research ethics involving humans is governed by the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research, jointly issued by the NHMRC, ARC and Universities Australia. A student planning to survey high-school teachers about workload must address research ethics before recruiting anyone, not after data collection has already started.

Research Gap

A research gap is an unanswered question, understudied population or unresolved contradiction identified in the existing literature, which a new study is designed to address or partially fill.

Identifying a genuine research gap, rather than a topic simply of personal interest, is what justifies a thesis or dissertation to an Australian supervisor and examiner. A literature review might reveal extensive research on burnout in metropolitan nurses but almost none in rural and remote Australian nursing, establishing a clear regional research gap.

Research Instrument

Research instrument is the specific tool used to collect data, such as a questionnaire, interview schedule, observation checklist or measurement scale, designed to capture information relevant to the research question.

Australian methodology chapters typically justify why a chosen research instrument suits the research question, and note whether it is an existing validated tool or newly developed. A study on nursing workload stress might adapt an existing validated stress-scale instrument rather than designing a new one from scratch, saving development time while still fitting the local context.

Research Integrity

Research integrity is a researcher's honest, accurate and accountable conduct throughout a study, covering the accurate reporting of data, appropriate authorship, and avoidance of fabrication, falsification or plagiarism.

Research integrity is distinct from research ethics: ethics concerns how participants are treated, while integrity concerns whether the researcher is honest about their methods and results. Australian universities follow the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research, and a student who quietly deletes inconvenient survey responses to get a cleaner result has breached research integrity even without harming anyone.

Research Objective

A research objective is a specific, measurable step that operationalises the broader research aim, typically written as one of several numbered statements describing exactly what the study will do.

Australian markers check that objectives use precise, assessable verbs (identify, compare, measure, evaluate) rather than vague ones like understand or explore. A dissertation on nurse burnout might list objectives such as measuring burnout prevalence, identifying contributing workplace factors, and comparing results across two hospital wards.

Research Philosophy

Research philosophy is the overarching term for the set of beliefs a researcher holds about knowledge (epistemology) and reality (ontology), which together shape their chosen paradigm, approach and design.

Australian business and social science theses often devote an early methodology section to research philosophy, working through ontology and epistemology before naming a paradigm such as positivism or interpretivism. Making this reasoning explicit, rather than assumed, is what distinguishes a strong methodology chapter from a weak one in most Australian marking rubrics.

Related: Epistemology, Ontology, Paradigm

Research Question

A research question is the specific, answerable question that a study sets out to investigate, framing exactly what the researcher wants to know and guiding every subsequent methodological decision.

Australian university ethics committees and supervisors usually expect a research question to be narrow enough to answer within a candidature's timeframe. A common early-draft mistake is asking something too broad, such as the impact of remote learning on university outcomes, rather than narrowing it to one cohort, one institution and one measurable outcome.

Researcher Bias

Researcher bias is any systematic, often unconscious, influence of a researcher's own beliefs, expectations or characteristics on how a study is designed, conducted, interpreted or reported.

Researcher bias can appear as confirmation bias, where a researcher unconsciously favours data that supports their hypothesis, or as an interviewer subtly leading responses. Reflexivity, peer debriefing and having a second coder independently check themes are standard ways Australian candidates manage and report researcher bias rather than pretend it does not exist.

Response Bias

Response bias is a systematic tendency for participants to answer questions inaccurately, for example by giving socially desirable answers or consistently favouring one end of a rating scale.

Response bias is a common limitation raised in AU self-report research, distinct from sampling bias because it concerns how people answer rather than who was selected. On a workplace survey, an employee might show social-desirability response bias by rating manager support highly even when privately dissatisfied, out of concern that answers are not truly anonymous.

Response Rate

Response rate is the proportion of people invited to take part in a survey or study who actually complete and return it, usually expressed as a percentage.

Low response rates are a recurring limitation noted in AU survey-based theses, since they can introduce non-response bias if respondents differ systematically from non-respondents. A researcher who emails a questionnaire to 500 alumni and receives 95 completed responses has a 19 per cent response rate, which should be reported and discussed rather than left unmentioned.

Rigour

Rigour is the overall thoroughness, care and methodological soundness with which a study is designed, conducted and reported, encompassing validity and reliability in quantitative work and trustworthiness in qualitative work.

Examiners of Australian honours, masters and PhD theses assess rigour by checking whether methods are appropriate, transparently reported and consistently applied, not by the size or prestige of the study alone. A small, carefully triangulated qualitative study can be judged more rigorous than a large survey built on a poorly validated instrument.

Risk of Harm

Risk of harm is the potential for a research study to cause physical, psychological, social, economic or legal harm to participants, which ethics committees weigh against the study's expected benefits.

Australian HRECs classify studies as negligible, low or higher risk, with higher-risk categories (such as research on trauma survivors or children) requiring full committee review rather than expedited approval. A study asking domestic-violence survivors to recount their experiences carries a real risk of psychological harm and needs referral pathways to support services built into the design.

S

Sample

Sample is the subset of individuals or cases actually selected from the population to take part in a study, used to draw conclusions without collecting data from everyone.

Australian ethics applications typically require the proposed sample and its selection method to be specified before recruitment starts, since HREC panels check that it can realistically answer the research question. A researcher studying burnout among Melbourne paramedics might recruit a sample of 60 paramedics from three metropolitan ambulance stations rather than attempting to survey the entire workforce.

Sample Size

Sample size is the number of participants, cases or units included in a study, chosen to balance statistical power or thematic depth against the practical limits of time and access.

AU quantitative theses commonly justify sample size with a power calculation, while qualitative theses justify it with reference to saturation instead of a fixed number. A mixed-methods project might recruit 200 survey respondents for statistical power and 12 interviewees for depth, with both figures defended in the methodology chapter rather than chosen arbitrarily.

Sampling Bias

Sampling bias is a systematic distortion that occurs when some members of the population are more likely to be selected than others, producing a sample that misrepresents the population it is meant to reflect.

Examiners in Australian universities routinely check whether a study's sampling method could have introduced sampling bias before accepting its conclusions as generalisable. An online-only survey about digital banking habits, for example, would carry sampling bias by excluding older Australians with limited internet access, skewing results toward tech-comfortable respondents.

Sampling Error

Sampling error is the natural, unavoidable difference between a sample statistic and the true population value that arises simply because a sample, not the whole population, was measured.

Unlike sampling bias, sampling error is not a mistake and cannot be fully eliminated, only reduced, typically by increasing sample size. If repeated Australian surveys each drew a fresh random sample of 500 voters, average support for a policy might read 44 per cent in one sample and 47 per cent in another purely due to sampling error.

Sampling Frame

Sampling frame is the actual list or source, such as a staff register or electoral roll, from which a sample is drawn and which should closely match the target population.

A mismatch between the sampling frame and the target population creates coverage error, a common weakness examiners flag in AU methodology chapters. For instance, using a university's currently enrolled student email list as a sampling frame will miss students who deferred or withdrew, skewing a study of student wellbeing if that group behaves differently.

Saturation

Saturation is the point in qualitative data collection at which new interviews, observations or cases stop producing new themes or insights, signalling that sample size is sufficient.

Reporting saturation, rather than a fixed number, is how many Australian qualitative theses justify a sample of ten to twenty interviewees in the methodology chapter. A researcher might report that by the fourteenth interview, no new themes emerged across three consecutive transcripts, and recruitment stopped there.

Scoping Review

A scoping review is a systematic mapping exercise that surveys the size, scope and nature of the existing literature on a broad topic, rather than answering one narrow, focused question.

Scoping reviews are useful when a field is new or fragmented, mapping what evidence exists and what key concepts are used before anyone commits to a full systematic review. An Australian PhD candidate might first run a scoping review of AI tutoring in higher education to check whether enough primary studies exist to justify a systematic review later.

Secondary Data

Secondary data is information originally collected by someone else, such as government statistics or a prior study's dataset, that a researcher reanalyses for a new research question.

Secondary data is common in AU policy and economics research because it is faster and cheaper to access than running new data collection, though the researcher cannot control how it was originally gathered. A student analysing housing affordability might reuse ABS census and rental price data instead of surveying households directly, then check the data's suitability for the current question.

Selective Coding

Selective coding is the final stage of the grounded theory coding process, in which a researcher identifies a core category and systematically relates all other categories to it to build a theory.

Selective coding narrows dozens of categories down to one central storyline that explains the phenomenon under study, discarding categories that do not clearly relate to it. An Australian PhD candidate studying rural nursing retention might select 'professional isolation' as the core category around which the entire grounded theory is built.

Self-Report

Self-report is any data collection approach in which participants provide information about their own behaviour, attitudes or experiences directly, typically through a survey, questionnaire or interview.

Self-report data is efficient to collect but AU researchers are expected to acknowledge its limitations, since participants may misremember events or answer in a socially desirable way. A study relying on a self-report questionnaire asking how many hours students studied last week may overestimate true study time, which is why some researchers pair it with objective records where possible.

Semi-Structured Interview

Semi-structured interview is a data collection method that follows a core list of pre-planned questions while allowing the interviewer to probe, reorder or add questions in response to what the participant says.

Semi-structured interviews are the most common qualitative data collection method in Australian honours and PhD research, balancing comparability with room for unexpected insight. A researcher might prepare eight core questions on an interview schedule but follow up with further prompts whenever a participant raises something unanticipated and relevant.

Simple Random Sampling

Simple random sampling is a probability method in which every unit in the sampling frame has an equal chance of selection, typically achieved using random number generators or lottery-style draws.

Because it requires a complete sampling frame, simple random sampling works well for AU studies with an accessible list, such as a hospital's patient database, but is harder to apply to populations without a central register. A researcher might number every patient record from 1 to 500 and use software to draw 100 at random for a service-satisfaction survey.

Skewness

Skewness is a measure of how asymmetrical a distribution is around its mean, with positive skew indicating a longer tail of high values and negative skew a longer tail of low values.

Household income in Australia is typically positively skewed, with most households clustered at moderate incomes and a small number of very high earners stretching the tail to the right. When skewness is substantial, researchers often report the median rather than the mean, or apply a data transformation before running parametric tests.

Snowball Sampling

Snowball sampling is a non-probability method in which existing participants recruit or refer future participants from their own networks, useful for reaching small or hard-to-access populations.

Snowball sampling suits AU studies of populations without a public list, such as informal carers or a specific migrant community, where a gatekeeper's introduction builds trust. A researcher might start with two known participants who each refer two or three further contacts, continuing until enough depth or saturation is reached.

Spearman Correlation

Spearman correlation is a non-parametric statistic that measures the strength and direction of the relationship between two ranked or ordinal variables without assuming a linear or normally distributed relationship.

Denoted rho, Spearman correlation is the appropriate choice when data are ordinal, such as Likert-scale satisfaction ratings, or when a Pearson correlation's normality assumption is not met. An Australian researcher analysing the relationship between class rank and self-reported confidence would typically choose Spearman over Pearson correlation.

SPSS

SPSS is a widely used statistical software package that allows researchers to manage datasets and run descriptive and inferential analyses through a menu-driven interface rather than writing code.

Short for Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, SPSS remains the standard statistics program taught in Australian psychology, business and health science degrees because its point-and-click menus suit students without a programming background. A student might use SPSS to run a t-test on survey data and export the output table into a thesis appendix.

Standard Deviation

Standard deviation is a measure of spread that shows, on average, how far individual scores in a dataset lie from the mean, expressed in the same units as the original data.

A small standard deviation means scores cluster tightly around the mean, while a large one signals wide variability, which Australian journal articles usually report alongside the mean in APA format, such as M = 65.4, SD = 9.1. Two classes can share the same average mark yet have very different standard deviations if one class is more mixed in ability.

Statistical Power

Statistical power is the probability that a study will correctly detect a real effect or difference in the population when one genuinely exists, rather than missing it.

Conventionally set at .80, statistical power depends on sample size, effect size and significance level, which is why Australian ethics committees often ask for a power analysis before approving a study. An underpowered study with too few participants risks a false negative, concluding there is no effect when one actually exists.

Statistical Significance

Statistical significance is a conclusion that a result observed in sample data is unlikely to have occurred by chance alone, typically judged against a p-value threshold set before the analysis.

A statistically significant result is not automatically a meaningful or large one, which is why Australian supervisors push students to also report effect size. A tiny difference in exam marks between two very large cohorts can reach statistical significance while making almost no practical difference to any individual student.

Stratified Sampling

Stratified sampling is a probability technique that divides the population into subgroups, or strata, sharing a key characteristic, then randomly samples from within each stratum to ensure proportional representation.

Stratified sampling suits Australian studies where a subgroup, such as regional versus metropolitan students, might respond differently and needs guaranteed representation rather than being left to chance. A researcher comparing digital literacy might stratify by state (NSW, VIC, QLD, other) and then randomly sample within each state so no state is over- or under-represented.

Structured Interview

Structured interview is a data collection method that asks every participant an identical, pre-set list of questions in the same order, maximising consistency between interviews at the cost of flexibility.

Structured interviews suit Australian studies needing directly comparable answers across many participants, functioning similarly to a spoken questionnaire. A researcher evaluating a workplace training programme might ask each of 30 employees the identical set of 15 questions, in the same order, so responses can be compared and, where suitable, coded numerically.

Survey

Survey is a data collection method that gathers standardised information from a sample of respondents, usually through a questionnaire, to describe attitudes, behaviours or characteristics across a population.

Surveys are popular in AU business and health theses because they collect comparable data from many respondents relatively quickly and cheaply. A researcher investigating remote-work satisfaction might distribute an online survey to 300 employees across several Australian companies, then analyse the closed-question responses statistically.

Systematic Review

A systematic review is a highly structured synthesis of research that uses a predefined, replicable search strategy, explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria, and quality appraisal to answer a focused research question.

Systematic reviews are gold-standard evidence in health and medical fields and typically follow PRISMA reporting guidelines, often being registered in advance on a platform like PROSPERO. An Australian nursing academic conducting a systematic review of falls-prevention interventions would search multiple databases using the same search terms and document every study excluded and why.

Systematic Sampling

Systematic sampling is a probability method that selects every nth case from an ordered sampling frame after a random starting point, producing an evenly spread sample with minimal manual selection.

Systematic sampling is a practical alternative to simple random sampling when a full list exists but individual random draws are impractical by hand. A researcher with a sampling frame of 3,000 alumni might pick a random start between 1 and 30, then select every 30th name on the list, yielding a sample of about 100 without needing random number software.

T

T-Test

A t-test is a statistical test that compares the means of two groups to determine whether the difference between them is statistically significant or likely due to chance.

An independent-samples t-test compares two separate groups, such as marks for students who did and did not attend tutorials, while a paired-samples t-test compares the same group at two time points, such as before and after an intervention. SPSS reports a t-statistic and an accompanying p-value for the comparison.

Target Population

Target population refers to the specific subgroup of the wider population that a researcher intends to describe or generalise findings to, defined by criteria such as age, location or occupation.

In an AU honours or PhD proposal, distinguishing the target population from the broader population shows examiners the study's boundaries are deliberate, not accidental. A study on financial literacy might set the wider population as all Australian adults but narrow the target population to first-year university students enrolled in a business degree, since that group is both accessible and relevant to the research question.

Test-Retest Reliability

Test-retest reliability is a measure of consistency calculated by administering the same test to the same participants on two separate occasions and correlating the two sets of scores.

A high test-retest reliability score indicates the instrument is stable over time rather than sensitive to random daily fluctuation. An Australian psychology student piloting an anxiety scale might administer it to the same cohort two weeks apart, expecting a strong positive correlation if the tool is dependable.

Thematic Analysis

Thematic analysis is a qualitative method for identifying, analysing and reporting patterns of meaning, or themes, across a dataset such as interview transcripts or open-ended survey responses.

Following the widely taught Braun and Clarke approach, thematic analysis moves through familiarisation, coding, and theme development, and can be inductive, building themes from the data itself, or deductive, applying themes from existing theory. An Australian nursing thesis might use thematic analysis to identify recurring themes such as fear of judgement across patient interviews.

Theme

A theme is a pattern of shared meaning that captures something significant about the data in relation to the research question, built up from multiple related codes.

A theme is broader than a single code and usually emerges only after several codes are grouped together and reviewed against the whole dataset. An Australian education study might develop the theme fear of falling behind from separate codes such as procrastination, comparison with peers, and reluctance to seek help.

Theoretical Framework

A theoretical framework is the existing, established theory or set of theories that a researcher adopts to explain the phenomenon under study and to interpret findings within a recognised academic tradition.

Australian business theses on employee motivation, for instance, often adopt Self-Determination Theory or Maslow's hierarchy as their theoretical framework, using its established concepts to interpret survey results. Choosing the wrong theoretical framework, one that does not actually fit the research question, is a common source of examiner criticism.

Thick Description

Thick description is a detailed, richly contextualised account of a research setting, participants and events that allows a reader to judge how findings might transfer to another context.

The term originates with anthropologist Clifford Geertz and underpins transferability: without enough contextual detail, a reader cannot judge whether findings apply elsewhere. An Australian ethnography of a rural volunteer fire brigade would use thick description to capture the specific culture, routines and relationships, not just a bare summary stating that volunteers cooperate well.

Transferability

Transferability is the degree to which qualitative findings from one specific context can be meaningfully applied to other, similar settings, serving as the qualitative analogue to external validity.

Unlike generalisability, transferability is judged by the reader, not the researcher, who provides a thick description of the context so others can decide whether findings fit their own situation. A case study of remote-learning barriers at one regional Australian TAFE becomes transferable when it is described in enough detail for another regional campus to compare itself against it.

Triangulation

Triangulation is the practice of combining multiple data sources, methods, theories or investigators within a single study to cross-check findings and strengthen confidence in the overall conclusions.

Common forms include data triangulation (multiple sources), methodological triangulation (mixing surveys with interviews) and investigator triangulation (multiple coders). An Australian mixed-methods study of workplace burnout might triangulate self-report survey data with manager interviews and rostering records, so a consistent pattern across all three strengthens the finding's credibility.

Triangulation of Data

Triangulation of data is the practice of analysing multiple data sources or methods, such as interviews, documents and observation, to see whether they converge on the same finding.

Triangulation of data strengthens an analysis by showing that a finding is not simply an artefact of one method or one data source, which Australian ethics and examiner panels often look for in mixed-methods theses. A researcher might triangulate interview themes against staff meeting minutes and direct workplace observation before drawing a conclusion.

Trustworthiness

Trustworthiness is the qualitative-research equivalent of validity and reliability, referring to the overall rigour and believability of a study as judged through credibility, transferability, dependability and confirmability.

Trustworthiness was proposed by Lincoln and Guba as an alternative framework for qualitative rigour, since quantitative validity criteria do not map neatly onto interview- or observation-based research. An Australian PhD candidate using grounded theory would demonstrate trustworthiness through techniques like member checking, an audit trail and reflexive journaling.

U

Unit of Analysis

The unit of analysis is the specific person, group, organisation, document or event that is the main level at which a researcher collects data and reports findings in a study.

Getting the unit of analysis wrong is a common Australian undergraduate mistake, especially confusing it with the unit of observation. A study on Australian small business resilience might collect survey responses from individual owners (the unit of observation) but analyse and report results at the level of the business itself (the unit of analysis).

Unstructured Interview

Unstructured interview is a flexible, conversational data collection method guided by broad topics rather than fixed questions, allowing participants to lead the direction and depth of discussion.

Unstructured interviews appear in AU ethnographic and narrative research where the researcher wants a participant's own priorities to shape the conversation, rather than the researcher's assumptions. An interviewer studying resettlement experiences might open with only 'Tell me about your first year in Australia' and let subsequent questions arise naturally from the response.

V

Validity

Validity is the extent to which a research instrument, method or finding actually measures or reflects what it claims to measure, rather than something else entirely.

Validity is an umbrella term that splits into internal, external, construct, content, criterion and face validity, each checking a different kind of accuracy. Australian ethics and grant applications (e.g. NHMRC-funded projects) require researchers to justify the validity of their instruments before data collection begins, such as piloting a new survey against an established, validated scale.

Variable

A variable is any characteristic, attribute or condition that can change or take different values across the people, objects or events being studied, and can be measured, manipulated or observed.

Australian research methods units typically introduce variables before splitting them into independent, dependent, confounding and control types. Age, income, exam score and self-reported stress are all variables; a study only becomes research once the relationships between selected variables are specified and tested.

Variance

Variance is a measure of spread equal to the average of the squared differences between each score and the dataset's mean, forming the basis for standard deviation and many inferential tests.

Because variance squares each deviation, its units are not directly interpretable, which is why Australian students usually take the square root to report standard deviation instead. ANOVA, however, works directly with variance, comparing variance between groups to variance within groups to test whether group means differ significantly.

Vulnerable Participants

Vulnerable participants are individuals or groups, such as children, people with cognitive impairment, prisoners or those in unequal power relationships, who face a heightened risk of harm or coercion in research and require extra ethical safeguards.

The National Statement identifies specific vulnerable groups, including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, pregnant women and people highly dependent on medical care, each with a dedicated ethics chapter. A student wanting to survey their own undergraduate class must consider the power imbalance if a lecturer is recruiting their own students as vulnerable participants.

Z

Z-Score

A z-score is a standardised value that shows how many standard deviations a single score lies above or below the mean of its distribution.

Converting raw scores to z-scores lets Australian researchers compare results measured on different scales, such as comparing a student's mark on a maths test to their mark on an essay. A z-score of +2 means a score sits two standard deviations above the mean, which is unusually high in a normal distribution.

Need the writing done, not just defined?

Our Masters- and PhD-qualified writers put every one of these principles into practice, on your brief, in Australian English, Turnitin-checked and AI-free. Original work written from scratch, with free revisions.

Get a Free Quote See services

Frequently asked questions

Is this research methods glossary free to use?

Yes, this research methods glossary is completely free to use. Every term is defined in full on this page, with an Australian example, so you can look up what you need without signing up or paying.

Are the definitions written for Australian universities?

Yes, the definitions are written for Australian universities. They use Australian English spelling and reference Australian conventions, regulators and examples where relevant, so they match what your marker expects.

Can I cite this glossary in my assignment?

You can mention a definition to build your understanding, but for a formal assignment you should cite an authoritative source such as your unit guide, a set textbook, or your university library guide. Use this glossary to learn the concept, then reference a scholarly source in your work.

A